District 22 Councilman Peter Vallone Jr. (D-Astoria) was already causing a stir with his proposed ban on pit bulls, and understandably so. But opposition to his latest proposed pet legislation - restrictions on outdoor "tethering" - is as hard to parse as the proposal itself.
Under Vallone's proposal, Newsday reports, pet guardians who leave a dog tied outside for more than three hours during a 12-hour period would be subject to a warning, followed by a $250 fine for a second offense. Vallone is also considering a ban on outdoor "tethering" between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.
What could be wrong with that? Plenty, say some. According to the Dog Federation of New York - which is organizing against both the pit bull ban and tethering regs - such restrictions would punish "responsible" caretakers, including poor and minority pet parents.
Maybe I'm missing something, but what responsible pet guardian of any income level or background would leave his or her dog chained up for more than three hours in a day - much less leave a dog chained outside overnight? Considering just two very recent cases of dogs tied or caged outside and left to freeze or starve to death, it's high time for an anti-"tethering" law.
That said, suspicion of Vallone's motivation is warranted. Though he calls himself an "animal rights activist" and "animal lover," his record doesn't completely bear that out.
In addition to his maliciously ignorant assault on an entire breed
of dog, Vallone hasn't always come to the aid of animals - even
domestic animals - when presented the opportunity to do so. The
councilman scored 60 out of 100 on the latest scorecard from the League
of Humane Voters of New York City. Though certainly not the worst on
the council - Speaker Christine Quinn rates a shameful zero - Vallone has
yet to get behind what is possibly the LOHV's highest local legislative
priority: the Pets in Housing Bill, which would save animals' lives by
ensuring that no-pet lease clauses, once waived, can not be reinstated
during a tenant's residency.
Backing such a rule would seem a no-brainer for someone who calls
himself an "animal lover," much less an "activist," but
the fact that Vallone is not a sponsor of the languishing Pets in
Housing law casts doubt on the purity of his intentions.
No more so, however, than the opposition by a group of "caring"
pet "owners" to another law that would dramatically improve, not to
mention save, the lives of countless dogs, shackled all day every day, who can only watch
in longing as the world passes them by.
Photo: UnchainYourDog.org