On Streetsblog today we posted comments from a reader who went to last week's Espaillat "town hall" meeting. Over 200 people were reportedly in attendance and a lot of topics were covered (more on that in a minute), but naturally I'm preoccupied with transportation. Here is Peter Brinkmann's account of Espaillat's remarks on Inwood cut-through traffic:
In response to my question about distorted traffic patterns caused by car commuters who take the Broadway bridge in order to avoid paying the toll for Henry Hudson Bridge, he launched into his usual routine about how East River bridge tolls would be a regressive tax on families; he didn't address the issue of a residential neighborhood serving as a bypass for a major artery. When asked about possibly repaving 218th Street, he seemed to be in favor, in part because 218th Street draws a lot of traffic from drivers who want to avoid Henry Hudson Bridge. In other words, he's aware of distorted traffic patterns and doesn't seem to have a problem with them.
Peter says Espaillat "dismissed the upcoming MTA fare hike as nothing more than a regular increase [not true] and didn't address the bigger problem of service cuts." If you're confused as to how a representative from a district where 80 percent of the population relies on transit could be so disconnected, here is Espaillat on the subject of planned improvements to 1 train platforms:
Is it really possible that Adriano Espaillat doesn't know that the 9 train no longer exists?
At any rate, at least two Inwood blogs did an admirable job covering this event -- newcomers Inwoodette and Jewyorican -- both of whom I'll be adding to the blog roll ASAP. I'll probably crib from their notes for future posts, but until then, read all about it.